Management

What I got wrong about motivation for twenty years, and what finally changed my mind about all of it

I spent two decades trying to motivate people. It turns out I was solving the wrong problem, and the right one was less flattering to me.

For most of my working life I believed that motivating a team was something you did to them. A good speech. A visible target. Recognition at the right moment.

Some of it worked, briefly. None of it lasted, and I assumed the fault was in the delivery.

The wrong problem

What changed my mind was watching a team become visibly motivated with no intervention from me at all. Their circumstances had improved in one specific way: the obstacles had been removed. The approvals that took three weeks now took two days.

Nobody had given a speech.

What I do now

I assume motivation is already present and ask what is standing on it. Usually it is an approval queue, an unclear boundary, or a colleague nobody wants to name. Removing one of those does more than a quarter of encouragement.

This was not a pleasant realisation. It is more flattering to be an inspiring leader than an efficient clearer of obstacles. But the second one is the job.

Share this

Reader Forum

Join the conversation

Readers ask Andrew questions, share what a chapter changed, and argue about the hard parts. Andrew reads every thread.

Go to the forum